Back to news

Technical Debate: Keiko and Sánchez Teams on Economy and Jobs

EconomyMay 29, 20264 minSource: ATV.pe🇪🇸 Leer en español

On May 29, 2026, a technical debate was held between the teams of Keiko Fujimori and Pedro Sánchez, focusing on the economy and employment in Peru. This event was organized in the context of growing voter interest in the economic proposals of the candidates, particularly in a country where economic recovery and job creation are critical issues following the crisis triggered by the pandemic.

During the debate, representatives from both teams presented their visions on how to tackle unemployment and stimulate the economy. Fujimori’s team emphasized the importance of implementing policies that promote private investment and the creation of new businesses, particularly in sectors such as technology and agriculture. They argued that fostering a favorable environment for entrepreneurs is essential for generating sustainable employment.

Conversely, Sánchez’s team focused their discourse on the need to strengthen the social protection system and guarantee labor rights. They proposed a more comprehensive approach that not only focused on job creation but also on improving working conditions and increasing the minimum wage. This proposal resonated especially in a context where many informal workers struggle to obtain labor benefits.

The debate also addressed the current labor market situation in Latin America, which has been hit by economic instability and high rates of informality. According to recent reports, Peru faces persistent unemployment that has affected various regions of the country, especially young people and women. Both teams acknowledged the urgency of implementing effective strategies to combat unemployment and improve the quality of life for citizens.

By the end of the debate, it became clear that although there are differences in proposals, the consensus on the importance of the economy and employment for the future of Peru is a theme that unifies candidates and their teams. Such discussions are crucial for voters to make informed decisions in an increasingly complex electoral context.

Comments (0)

Sign in to comment

Sign in

Be the first to comment